mikesmith(老猫)
A plan to allow townhouses and small apartment buildings up to six storeys on major streets across Toronto has been approved by a city committee, but concerns are being raised about its viability as a tool to address the housing crisis.
(#16089706@0)
Last Updated: 5-12
This post has been archived. It cannot be replied.
Replies, comments and Discussions:
-
枫下家园 / 枫下觅巢 /
tor
将来所有的街区都会被允许盖镇屋和低层公寓
-mikesmith(老猫);
5-12
{717}
(#16089706@0)
+2
A plan to allow townhouses and small apartment buildings up to six storeys on major streets across Toronto has been approved by a city committee, but concerns are being raised about its viability as a tool to address the housing crisis.
-
这个半独立看起来不错，价钱也行
-mikesmith(老猫);
5-12
{613}
(#16089721@0)
+2
On the outside, 149 Gladstone Ave. looks like your typical Beaconsfield Village semi-detached house.
But inside is an explosion of colour and pers...
-
老猫你要不英文有问题要不中午有问题，不是所有街区，是major street only。不过这是好事。
-jeffrey815(Smartiecat);
5-12
(#16089733@0)
+2
-
这意味着土地房可以随便改成town或者公寓没有限制吗？
-bststl(bststl);
5-12
(#16089739@0)
+1
-
关系户可以
-firetrain(火车头);
5-12
(#16089865@0)
-
这个文章说的是现在，我说的是将来
-mikesmith(老猫);
5-12
(#16089894@0)
+1
-
可能性不大 ，主要街道增加人口密度对于政府来说一个最大利益在于有利于提高公共交通效率，同时大幅度增加地税收入。
-straw0910(linda);
5-12
(#16090353@0)
+2
-
现在沿着龙脉BAYVIEW，FINCH沿路向西，将要或者都盖满了TH，价格不菲。我觉得这是利用现有土地资源，不是坏事，否则那些破旧老屋没人住，或者只住一家人利用率太低了
-m0ba(莫⑧);
5-12
(#16089906@0)
+2
-
首先受益的是市中心和龙脉两侧的独立屋，建设从那里开始。
-czczcz(看得清);
5-12
(#16090032@0)
-
有啥严重后果?
-killer(_);
5-12
(#16090083@0)
+1
-
搞不了，市政基础设施跟不上。价格也便宜不下来
-kittywhy(kittywhy);
5-12
(#16090484@0)
+2
-
会出现很多问题。即使一块宅基地能够容纳很多户，很多层，停车问题不可能在自己的宅基地上解决。这就会把问题推给周围的邻居，占用城市街道。而这可是主要街道。还有层高的问题，原本前院是两层住宅，现在变成6层，有压抑感和遮光问题。噪音问题。还会有很多问题。
-2841999(四友);
5-12
(#16090659@0)
+1
-
做这样的规划，其中一条就是期待住户使用公共交通，自己家没车。
-spitfireto(很有意思);
5-13
(#16090926@0)
