×

Loading...
Ad by
  • 技多不压身,工到自然成:安省技工证书特训班,点击咨询报名!
Ad by
  • 技多不压身,工到自然成:安省技工证书特训班,点击咨询报名!

找了演讲原文的英文版本,

本文发表在 rolia.net 枫下论坛Since I last stood in this spot, a whole new generation of the
Miller Family has been born: Four great grandchildren.

Along with all the other members of our close-knit family, they are
my and Shirley's most precious possessions.

And I know that's how you feel about your family also. Like you, I
think of their future, the promises and the perils they will face.

Like you, I believe that the next four years will determine what
kind of world they will grow up in.

And like you, I ask which leader is it today that has the vision,
the willpower and, yes, the backbone to best protect my family?

The clear answer to that question has placed me in this hall with
you tonight. For my family is more important than my party.

There is but one man to whom I am willing to entrust their future
and that man's name is George Bush.

In the summer of 1940, I was an 8-year-old boy living in a remote
little Appalachian valley. Our country was not yet at war, but even
we children knew that there were some crazy men across the ocean who
would kill us if they could.

President Roosevelt, in his speech that summer, told America "all
private plans, all private lives, have been in a sense repealed by
an overriding public danger."

In 1940, Wendell Wilkie was the Republican nominee.

And there is no better example of someone repealing their "private
plans" than this good man. He gave Roosevelt the critical support he
needed for a peacetime draft, an unpopular idea at the time.

And he made it clear that he would rather lose the election than
make national security a partisan campaign issue.

Shortly before Wilkie died, he told a friend, that if he could write
his own epitaph and had to choose between "here lies a president" or
"here lies one who contributed to saving freedom," he would prefer
the latter.

Where are such statesmen today?

Where is the bipartisanship in this country when we need it most?

Now, while young Americans are dying in the sands of Iraq and the
mountains of Afghanistan, our nation is being torn apart and made
weaker because of the Democrat's manic obsession to bring down our
Commander in Chief.

What has happened to the party I've spent my life working in?

I can remember when Democrats believed that it was the duty of
America to fight for freedom over tyranny.

It was Democratic President Harry Truman who pushed the Red Army out
of Iran, who came to the aid of Greece when Communists threatened to
overthrow it, who stared down the Soviet blockade of West Berlin by
flying in supplies and saving the city.

Time after time in our history, in the face of great danger,
Democrats and Republicans worked together to ensure that freedom
would not falter. But not today.

Motivated more by partisan politics than by national security,
today's Democratic leaders see America as an occupier, not a
liberator.

And nothing makes this Marine madder than someone calling American
troops occupiers rather than liberators.

Tell that to the one-half of Europe that was freed because Franklin
Roosevelt led an army of liberators, not occupiers.

Tell that to the lower half of the Korean Peninsula that is free
because Dwight Eisenhower commanded an army of liberators, not
occupiers.

Tell that to the half a billion men, women and children who are free
today from the Baltics to the Crimea, from Poland to Siberia,
because Ronald Reagan rebuilt a military of liberators, not
occupiers.

Never in the history of the world has any soldier sacrificed more
for the freedom and liberty of total strangers than the American
soldier. And, our soldiers don't just give freedom abroad, they
preserve it for us here at home.

For it has been said so truthfully that it is the soldier, not the
reporter, who has given us the freedom of the press. It is the
soldier, not the poet, who has given us freedom of speech.

It is the soldier, not the agitator, who has given us the freedom to
protest.

It is the soldier who salutes the flag, serves beneath the flag,
whose coffin is draped by the flag, who gives that protester the
freedom to abuse and burn that flag.

No one should dare to even think about being the Commander in Chief
of this country if he doesn't believe with all his heart that our
soldiers are liberators abroad and defenders of freedom at home.

But don't waste your breath telling that to the leaders of my party
today. In their warped way of thinking America is the problem, not
the solution.

They don't believe there is any real danger in the world except that
which America brings upon itself through our clumsy and misguided
foreign policy.

It is not their patriotism -- it is their judgment that has been so
sorely lacking. They claimed Carter's pacifism would lead to peace.

They were wrong.

They claimed Reagan's defense buildup would lead to war.

They were wrong.

And, no pair has been more wrong, more loudly, more often than the
two Senators from Massachusetts, Ted Kennedy and John Kerry.

Together, Kennedy/Kerry have opposed the very weapons system that
won the Cold War and that is now winning the War on Terror.

Listing all the weapon systems that Senator Kerry tried his best to
shut down sounds like an auctioneer selling off our national
security but Americans need to know the facts.

The B-1 bomber, that Senator Kerry opposed, dropped 40 percent of
the bombs in the first six months of Operation Enduring Freedom.

The B-2 bomber, that Senator Kerry opposed, delivered air strikes
against the Taliban in Afghanistan and Hussein's command post in
Iraq.

The F-14A Tomcats, that Senator Kerry opposed, shot down Khadifi's
Libyan MIGs over the Gulf of Sidra. The modernized F-14D, that
Senator Kerry opposed, delivered missile strikes against Tora Bora.

The Apache helicopter, that Senator Kerry opposed, took out those
Republican Guard tanks in Kuwait in the Gulf War. The F-15 Eagles,
that Senator Kerry opposed, flew cover over our Nation's Capital and
this very city after 9/11.

I could go on and on and on: against the Patriot Missile that shot
down Saddam Hussein's scud missiles over Israel; against the Aegis
air-defense cruiser; against the Strategic Defense Initiative;
against the Trident missile; against, against, against.

This is the man who wants to be the Commander in Chief of our U.S.
Armed Forces?

U.S. forces armed with what? Spitballs?

Twenty years of votes can tell you much more about a man than twenty
weeks of campaign rhetoric.

Campaign talk tells people who you want them to think you are. How
you vote tells people who you really are deep inside.

Senator Kerry has made it clear that he would use military force
only if approved by the United Nations.

Kerry would let Paris decide when America needs defending.

I want Bush to decide.

John Kerry, who says he doesn't like outsourcing, wants to outsource
our national security.

That's the most dangerous outsourcing of all. This politician wants
to be leader of the free world.

Free for how long?

For more than 20 years, on every one of the great issues of freedom
and security, John Kerry has been more wrong, more weak and more
wobbly than any other national figure.

As a war protester, Kerry blamed our military.

As a Senator, he voted to weaken our military. And nothing shows
that more sadly and more clearly than his vote this year to deny
protective armor for our troops in harms way, far away.

George Bush understands that we need new strategies to meet new
threats.

John Kerry wants to re-fight yesterday's war. George Bush believes
we have to fight today's war and be ready for tomorrow's challenges.
George Bush is committed to providing the kind of forces it takes to
root out terrorists.

No matter what spider hole they may hide in or what rock they crawl
under.

George Bush wants to grab terrorists by the throat and not let them
go to get a better grip.

From John Kerry, they get a "yes-no-maybe" bowl of mush that can
only encourage our enemies and confuse our friends.

I first got to know George Bush when we served as governors
together. I admire this man. I am moved by the respect he shows the
first lady, his unabashed love for his parents and his daughters,
and the fact that he is unashamed of his belief that God is not
indifferent to America.

I can identify with someone who has lived that line in "Amazing
Grace," "Was blind, but now I see," and I like the fact that he's
the same man on Saturday night that he is on Sunday morning.

He is not a slick talker but he is a straight shooter and, where I
come from, deeds mean a lot more than words.

I have knocked on the door of this man's soul and found someone
home, a God-fearing man with a good heart and a spine of tempered
steel.

The man I trust to protect my most precious possession: my family.

This election will change forever the course of history, and that's
not any history. It's our family's history.

The only question is how. The answer lies with each of us. And, like
many generations before us, we've got some hard choosing to do.

Right now the world just cannot afford an indecisive America.
Fainthearted self-indulgence will put at risk all we care about in
this world.

In this hour of danger our President has had the courage to stand
up. And this Democrat is proud to stand up with him.

Thank you.

God Bless this great country and God Bless George W. Bush.更多精彩文章及讨论,请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net
Report

Replies, comments and Discussions:

  • 枫下茶话 / 美国话题 / 不知道中文翻译得跟原文相比如何,但看中文的演说辞,真是有水平。“是我们的战士,而不是记者,给了我们媒体的自由;是我们的战士,而不是诗人,给了我们言论的自由;是我们的战士,而不是鼓动者,给了我们抗议的自由。”
    本文发表在 rolia.net 枫下论坛9月1 日晚,共和党全国大会议程进入第三天,民主党籍的重量级参议员米勒发表专题演讲力挺布什。专家认为在竞选双方民调如此相近之时,米勒抛开党派分歧支持布什将给民主党侯选人凯瑞阵营致命打击,因为米勒在倾向保守的民主党人士中颇具影响力,他的支持将有助于布什-切尼搭档争取到部份传统民主党选民的支持。更有评论家指出,米勒为布什站台可能引发传统民主党和凯瑞等代表的极左派民主党的分歧加大。


    米勒在12年前任乔治亚州州长时曾支持提名克林顿竞选总统,当时克林顿的对手正是现任总统布什的父亲老布什总统。但米勒在减税和伊拉克战争上的立场和总统布什看法相近,他在星期二接受NBC「今日」秀采访时声明,他依然是民主党员,但也批评说民主党左倾得厉害,以至他几乎认不出来了。

    米勒参议员年轻时做过商人,教师,参加过海军陆战队。他出过四本书,在四所大学当过教授。从政后当过市长,州参议员,副州长和州长。



    以下是米勒演讲的全文(略有删节):

    谢谢大家。

    从上次我站在这儿(编者注:指12年前米勒在民主党全国代表大会上演讲),米勒家族添了一代新人,我有了四个曾孙。他们和其他家庭成员一样,是我和舍莉(编者注:指米勒太太)的宝贵财富。我想你们对自己的家庭也会是这个想法。

    象你一样,我也在为他们的未来著想,我也在考虑他们将要面临的希望和危险。象你一样,我也相信未来的四年会决定他们将在什么样的世界里长大。

    象你一样,我也在问:今天哪位领导人更具远见卓识,更具意志力,还有,更具勇气来最好的保护我的家庭。

    我今晚和你们一起站在这儿就是我的答案,因为我的家庭的未来比我的党派更加重要。

    只有一个人能令我把我的后人的未来放心的交到他手中,他的名字是乔治.W.布什。

    在1940 年的夏天, 我还是一个8 岁的男孩,当时我住在一个矮小偏僻的阿巴拉契亚山谷。我们的国家还没有参加战争, 但是既使是小孩子我们也知道海洋对面有某些疯狂的人会杀死我们,如果他们有这个能力的话。

    罗斯福总统在那年的夏天告诉美国,「所有私人的生活和规划,在一定意义上都被这公共的危险给打破了」。

    1940年总统大选,文岱尔.威尔奇(Wendell Wilkie) 是共和党提名人。这个善良的人(为了我们的国家)取消了「个人的计划」,给大家树立了一个最好的榜样。

    他给予了罗斯福的和平时期计划所需要的关键支持,这在当时是一个不得人心的想法。

    他明确的指出,他宁可输掉选举,也不愿因为党派偏见在竞选中拿国家安全做文章。

    威尔奇在辞世前告诉一位朋友,如果他能够写自己的墓志铭而且必需从「这里长眠著一位总统」和「这里躺著一个普通人 他为保护自由做过贡献」中选一个的话,他宁可选择后者。

    这样的政治家现在哪里可寻?在我们国家需要的时候,象这样的两党之间精诚团结又在哪里?

    今天,当年轻的美国人在伊拉克的沙漠和阿富汗的山地为国捐躯的时候,我们的国家被搞得四分五裂和不再那么强大,正是因为民主党派狂躁偏执的想把我们的领导人弄下台。

    我为之奋斗了一生的党究竟怎么了?我还记得民主党人士相信美国有义务为自由战斗而推翻暴政的时候。民主党总统亨利.杜鲁门(Harry Truman)将红色军队赶出伊朗,在共产党威胁要颠覆希腊时给予援助,在苏联封锁西伯林时空投物资拯救了这座城市,这些都是这样的时候。 历史的年轮,留下了民主共和两党精诚合作,以保护自由不使凋零的痕迹。

    今天不同了。 当今的民主党领袖为党派政治利益所驱,而不是以国家安全为重,把美国看作占领者,而不是解放者。 没有什么比称美国军队是占领者,而不是解放者,让我这个美国海军陆战队的老兵更加义愤的了。

    你能这样告诉富兰克林.罗斯福带领的军队解放的半个欧洲吗?

    你能这样告诉德瓦特.艾森豪威尔指挥的军队保护了的朝鲜半岛南部的人民吗?

    你能这样告诉由于罗纳德.里根重建了我们的军事力量而获得自由的从波兰到西伯利亚的五亿男女老少吗?

    在世界的历史上从来没有谁象美国的战士一样为了陌生人的自由做出过这么大的牺牲。

    我们的战士不仅把自由带给外国的人民,也保护了我们在自己的家园享有同样的自由。

    确确切切的说,是我们的战士,而不是记者,给了我们媒体的自由;

    是我们的战士,而不是诗人,给了我们言论的自由;

    是我们的战士,而不是鼓动者,给了我们抗议的自由。

    是我们的战士向我们的国旗敬礼,在国旗之下服务,他们的灵柩也由国旗覆盖。

    正是我们的战士给了那位抗议者自由,而他却滥用这自由来焚烧同样的旗帜。

    如果有人不是真心认为我们的战士在国外是解放者,在国内是自由的护卫者,他就不该妄想成为我们国家的领导人。

    但不要费力告诉我党当前的领导,在他们变异的思维方式里,美国带来的只是问题,而不是答案,他们认为这世界上没有真正的危险,而是在他们看来笨拙和错误的美国外交政策带来的。 这不是爱国主义,这是他们缺乏判断力。

    他们说卡特的绥靖主义会带来和平,他们错了;

    他们说里根扩大国防开支会带来战争,他们错了。

    没有两个人比从麻州来的两个参议员,泰特.肯尼迪和约翰.凯瑞,讲得更多,更响,更加错误。

    他们共同反对过开发为我们赢得冷战的武器系统,这个系统正在为我们带来反恐战争的胜利。 列出这些凯瑞参议员全心全意要阻扰的武器系统听起来就象出卖我们的国家安全。

    但是,美国人民需要知道事实…… 这样的人能当我们武装力量的总司令吗?

    美国的军队用什么来武装?用口水就行吗?

    20年的投票历史比20个星期选战中的华丽辞藻更能说明问题。

    选战中说的话只是表明你想让人民认为你是什么样的人,而投票的历史则说明了你骨子里是个什么样的人。

    凯瑞参议员明确说明了只有联合国认同才会动用军事力量。

    凯瑞参议员要巴黎来决定美国何时需要防卫,我要布什决定。

    约翰.凯瑞说他不喜欢过度使用资源,但他却要过度使用我们的国家安全,这是最危险的。这样的政客想成为自由世界的领袖,这样的自由能维持多久?……

    乔治.W.布什明白在新的威胁下需要新的策略。

    约翰.凯瑞想打一场已经过去的战争,布什总统相信我们必需打今天的战争,并且要准备面临明天的挑战。布什总统决心提供根除恐怖分子的力量,不论他们藏在何处。

    乔治.W.布什要打中恐怖分子的要害,而不是让他们有机会喘息而卷土重来。

    从约翰.凯瑞那儿,他们得到「是/不是/也许」的废话,这只会鼓励我们的敌人,而让我们的朋友困惑。

    在我们都任州长的时候我认识了乔治.W.布什。我崇拜这个人。他对第一夫人的尊重,对他父母及女儿的关爱,他毫无保留的相信上帝会保佑美国的虔诚,这都让我感动。

    在圣歌《令人惊讶的雍容》(Amazing Grace)有一句歌词,「曾经目盲,但现在看见了」(…was blind,but now I see),我有同样的感受。我喜欢布什这样的人,你不会担心从星期六晚上到星期天早上,他会变成另一个人。

    他不是一个花言巧语的人,他直截了当。在我这儿,做事情比嘴上说说更重要。

    我敲开这个人的心灵之门,发现了一个心地善良、敬畏上帝和坚强不屈的人。我信任让他来保护我的最珍贵的财产:我的家庭。

    这次竞选将永远改变历史,这不是一般的历史,正是我们家庭的历史。

    唯一的问题是:如何改变? 答复就在我们每个人手中。就象我们的祖辈经历过的那样,我们要做出艰难的选择。当前的世界无法承受一个犹豫不决的美国。懦弱的自我陶醉只会将我们在这个世界里所爱的全部投入危险之中。

    在这危险时刻我们的总统有勇气站了出来,我这个民主党人很自豪地与他站在一起。

    谢谢。

    上帝保佑我们伟大的国家,上帝保护乔治.W.布什。更多精彩文章及讨论,请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net
    • 太好了.比我翻得还好.佩服.
    • 同感,翻译的人也很高。
    • 找了演讲原文的英文版本,
      本文发表在 rolia.net 枫下论坛Since I last stood in this spot, a whole new generation of the
      Miller Family has been born: Four great grandchildren.

      Along with all the other members of our close-knit family, they are
      my and Shirley's most precious possessions.

      And I know that's how you feel about your family also. Like you, I
      think of their future, the promises and the perils they will face.

      Like you, I believe that the next four years will determine what
      kind of world they will grow up in.

      And like you, I ask which leader is it today that has the vision,
      the willpower and, yes, the backbone to best protect my family?

      The clear answer to that question has placed me in this hall with
      you tonight. For my family is more important than my party.

      There is but one man to whom I am willing to entrust their future
      and that man's name is George Bush.

      In the summer of 1940, I was an 8-year-old boy living in a remote
      little Appalachian valley. Our country was not yet at war, but even
      we children knew that there were some crazy men across the ocean who
      would kill us if they could.

      President Roosevelt, in his speech that summer, told America "all
      private plans, all private lives, have been in a sense repealed by
      an overriding public danger."

      In 1940, Wendell Wilkie was the Republican nominee.

      And there is no better example of someone repealing their "private
      plans" than this good man. He gave Roosevelt the critical support he
      needed for a peacetime draft, an unpopular idea at the time.

      And he made it clear that he would rather lose the election than
      make national security a partisan campaign issue.

      Shortly before Wilkie died, he told a friend, that if he could write
      his own epitaph and had to choose between "here lies a president" or
      "here lies one who contributed to saving freedom," he would prefer
      the latter.

      Where are such statesmen today?

      Where is the bipartisanship in this country when we need it most?

      Now, while young Americans are dying in the sands of Iraq and the
      mountains of Afghanistan, our nation is being torn apart and made
      weaker because of the Democrat's manic obsession to bring down our
      Commander in Chief.

      What has happened to the party I've spent my life working in?

      I can remember when Democrats believed that it was the duty of
      America to fight for freedom over tyranny.

      It was Democratic President Harry Truman who pushed the Red Army out
      of Iran, who came to the aid of Greece when Communists threatened to
      overthrow it, who stared down the Soviet blockade of West Berlin by
      flying in supplies and saving the city.

      Time after time in our history, in the face of great danger,
      Democrats and Republicans worked together to ensure that freedom
      would not falter. But not today.

      Motivated more by partisan politics than by national security,
      today's Democratic leaders see America as an occupier, not a
      liberator.

      And nothing makes this Marine madder than someone calling American
      troops occupiers rather than liberators.

      Tell that to the one-half of Europe that was freed because Franklin
      Roosevelt led an army of liberators, not occupiers.

      Tell that to the lower half of the Korean Peninsula that is free
      because Dwight Eisenhower commanded an army of liberators, not
      occupiers.

      Tell that to the half a billion men, women and children who are free
      today from the Baltics to the Crimea, from Poland to Siberia,
      because Ronald Reagan rebuilt a military of liberators, not
      occupiers.

      Never in the history of the world has any soldier sacrificed more
      for the freedom and liberty of total strangers than the American
      soldier. And, our soldiers don't just give freedom abroad, they
      preserve it for us here at home.

      For it has been said so truthfully that it is the soldier, not the
      reporter, who has given us the freedom of the press. It is the
      soldier, not the poet, who has given us freedom of speech.

      It is the soldier, not the agitator, who has given us the freedom to
      protest.

      It is the soldier who salutes the flag, serves beneath the flag,
      whose coffin is draped by the flag, who gives that protester the
      freedom to abuse and burn that flag.

      No one should dare to even think about being the Commander in Chief
      of this country if he doesn't believe with all his heart that our
      soldiers are liberators abroad and defenders of freedom at home.

      But don't waste your breath telling that to the leaders of my party
      today. In their warped way of thinking America is the problem, not
      the solution.

      They don't believe there is any real danger in the world except that
      which America brings upon itself through our clumsy and misguided
      foreign policy.

      It is not their patriotism -- it is their judgment that has been so
      sorely lacking. They claimed Carter's pacifism would lead to peace.

      They were wrong.

      They claimed Reagan's defense buildup would lead to war.

      They were wrong.

      And, no pair has been more wrong, more loudly, more often than the
      two Senators from Massachusetts, Ted Kennedy and John Kerry.

      Together, Kennedy/Kerry have opposed the very weapons system that
      won the Cold War and that is now winning the War on Terror.

      Listing all the weapon systems that Senator Kerry tried his best to
      shut down sounds like an auctioneer selling off our national
      security but Americans need to know the facts.

      The B-1 bomber, that Senator Kerry opposed, dropped 40 percent of
      the bombs in the first six months of Operation Enduring Freedom.

      The B-2 bomber, that Senator Kerry opposed, delivered air strikes
      against the Taliban in Afghanistan and Hussein's command post in
      Iraq.

      The F-14A Tomcats, that Senator Kerry opposed, shot down Khadifi's
      Libyan MIGs over the Gulf of Sidra. The modernized F-14D, that
      Senator Kerry opposed, delivered missile strikes against Tora Bora.

      The Apache helicopter, that Senator Kerry opposed, took out those
      Republican Guard tanks in Kuwait in the Gulf War. The F-15 Eagles,
      that Senator Kerry opposed, flew cover over our Nation's Capital and
      this very city after 9/11.

      I could go on and on and on: against the Patriot Missile that shot
      down Saddam Hussein's scud missiles over Israel; against the Aegis
      air-defense cruiser; against the Strategic Defense Initiative;
      against the Trident missile; against, against, against.

      This is the man who wants to be the Commander in Chief of our U.S.
      Armed Forces?

      U.S. forces armed with what? Spitballs?

      Twenty years of votes can tell you much more about a man than twenty
      weeks of campaign rhetoric.

      Campaign talk tells people who you want them to think you are. How
      you vote tells people who you really are deep inside.

      Senator Kerry has made it clear that he would use military force
      only if approved by the United Nations.

      Kerry would let Paris decide when America needs defending.

      I want Bush to decide.

      John Kerry, who says he doesn't like outsourcing, wants to outsource
      our national security.

      That's the most dangerous outsourcing of all. This politician wants
      to be leader of the free world.

      Free for how long?

      For more than 20 years, on every one of the great issues of freedom
      and security, John Kerry has been more wrong, more weak and more
      wobbly than any other national figure.

      As a war protester, Kerry blamed our military.

      As a Senator, he voted to weaken our military. And nothing shows
      that more sadly and more clearly than his vote this year to deny
      protective armor for our troops in harms way, far away.

      George Bush understands that we need new strategies to meet new
      threats.

      John Kerry wants to re-fight yesterday's war. George Bush believes
      we have to fight today's war and be ready for tomorrow's challenges.
      George Bush is committed to providing the kind of forces it takes to
      root out terrorists.

      No matter what spider hole they may hide in or what rock they crawl
      under.

      George Bush wants to grab terrorists by the throat and not let them
      go to get a better grip.

      From John Kerry, they get a "yes-no-maybe" bowl of mush that can
      only encourage our enemies and confuse our friends.

      I first got to know George Bush when we served as governors
      together. I admire this man. I am moved by the respect he shows the
      first lady, his unabashed love for his parents and his daughters,
      and the fact that he is unashamed of his belief that God is not
      indifferent to America.

      I can identify with someone who has lived that line in "Amazing
      Grace," "Was blind, but now I see," and I like the fact that he's
      the same man on Saturday night that he is on Sunday morning.

      He is not a slick talker but he is a straight shooter and, where I
      come from, deeds mean a lot more than words.

      I have knocked on the door of this man's soul and found someone
      home, a God-fearing man with a good heart and a spine of tempered
      steel.

      The man I trust to protect my most precious possession: my family.

      This election will change forever the course of history, and that's
      not any history. It's our family's history.

      The only question is how. The answer lies with each of us. And, like
      many generations before us, we've got some hard choosing to do.

      Right now the world just cannot afford an indecisive America.
      Fainthearted self-indulgence will put at risk all we care about in
      this world.

      In this hour of danger our President has had the courage to stand
      up. And this Democrat is proud to stand up with him.

      Thank you.

      God Bless this great country and God Bless George W. Bush.更多精彩文章及讨论,请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net
      • 哥们,有没有录音,我想学习学习。
    • 把乔治.w.布什换成希特勒也一样.
      • 二战时德国老百姓就是这样被希特勒鼓动起来的.
      • 一样一样一样的啊。。。谢谢大家。
    • 谁都一个样,等再过几十年地球上的原油烧光了,美国加拿大全完蛋。
      • 乔治.w.布什 = 希特勒
    • 咱倒是看他与那小布屎乃一丘之貉, 也算个重量级穷兵赎武之徒吧.Y那几句不过是剽窃老毛的"枪杆子里边出政权"而已: 也就是说美国现在的一切利益和自由来自枪杆子, 美国人今后在世界的一切利益, 意愿和自由仍要靠枪杆子.
    • 这个老头太多的错处,居然还有人在给他叫好???大家看到他在Chris Mathrew Show上的表演了吗?从来没有看到一个政治家这么失态。。。另外连BUSH都说我们是Occupy IRAQ,也没有看他放个屁。
    • 是斧子,而不是伐木工人,提供了我们取暖的柴火;是锤子,而不是画家,帮我们把美丽的图画挂在墙上;是笔,而不是莎士比亚,写出了哈姆雷特。美国锤子!
      • : )