×

Loading...
Ad by
  • 技多不压身,工到自然成:安省技工证书特训班,点击咨询报名!
Ad by
  • 技多不压身,工到自然成:安省技工证书特训班,点击咨询报名!

投资理财系列之 从CHART中挑选互惠基金的简洁方法

本文发表在 rolia.net 枫下论坛若不能看图,请到本人BLOG(http://blog.wenxuecity.com/myblog.php?blogID=4870)去读,那儿有图形连接.

自去年本人在此发表自己有关挑选互惠基金的算法以来,有不少网友来EMAIL询问如何挑选互惠基金,有的网友还提出能否推荐几个好互惠基金. 算法固然简单,但要从上千个MF中选出中意的MF,有时还要看MF的PROFILES,这是很费力费时的事情. 从蕴良到最后剔出WINING FUND,我通常要用好几天的时间(主要是向基金公司索要SIMPLIFIED PROSPECTUS和年报,再阅读等花时间),可能对有的EMAIL恢复不是很迅速,即使是很快恢复,恐怕也没有经过仔细尊琢,敬请鉴谅. 我在想,能否弄出一个挑选MF的快捷方法,既可帮助广大的网友自己做功课(挑选MF),又可我的节省时间.基于此,特撰写”从CHART中挑选互惠基金的简洁方法”,以飨有兴趣的朋友. 有关MF的详细功课请参考我的有关如何挑选MF的系列POSTS.



1. 从图形看PERFORMANCE;

一个好的MF的CHART(月线图)应该看上去(用INCEP图):



直线或拟直线(趋向)单调上升,指数增长型也可;反之万万不可;
锯齿代表RISK系数,越少锯齿图形,MF性能越稳定,越好;
最好不要有大波谷图出现;
最好不要出现两次以上的下降齿;
2. 用RSIK系数风险品评:

RSIK大体上分类如下:

保守型: RISK<2;
BALANCE型: RISK<6;
GROWTH: RISK<20;
AGGRESSIVE: RISK<40;


3. 实例:

图1: TD MONTHLY INCOME, RISK=6.39

http://portfoliodb.theglobeandmail.com/gishome/plsql/gis.show_chart?comp_id=2643&fid1=51243&period=999&indx1_id=0&fid2=0&pi_mov_type=SMA&pi_mov_avg1=&pi_mov_avg2=&pi_mov_avg3=&iaction=Go&pi_universe=PUBLIC_FUND

评论: 我认为最标准的好MF CHATRS,04年前的RSIK肯定在4以下,近两年出现的两个锯齿导致它的风险上升到6.39;



图2: RBC MONTHLY INCOME:

http://portfoliodb.theglobeandmail.com/gishome/plsql/gis.show_chart?comp_id=2624&fid1=50094&period=999&indx1_id=0&fid2=0&pi_mov_type=SMA&pi_mov_avg1=&pi_mov_avg2=&pi_mov_avg3=&iaction=Go&pi_universe=PUBLIC_FUND



比价图2(RBC MONTHLY INCOME),与TD的属于同类产品;03年前的RISK不如TD(估计在4以上),但近三年RISK=4.77(没有锯齿)要优于TD(6.39)



图3:是MAWER NEW CANADA(SMALL-CAP, GROWTH类),

http://portfoliodb.theglobeandmail.com/gishome/plsql/gis.show_chart?comp_id=2599&fid1=17981&period=999&indx1_id=0&fid2=0&pi_mov_type=SMA&pi_mov_avg1=&pi_mov_avg2=&pi_mov_avg3=&iaction=Go&pi_universe=PUBLIC_FUND

RISK=9.39, 是RISK/RETURN比较优的一个MF,连续三年评为WINNER OF SMAL-CAP FUNDS. 05年出现的两个小锯齿导致RISK从8左右上升到现在的9.39;









图4是CIBC ENERGY(AGGESSIVE类)RISK=17.53.

http://portfoliodb.theglobeandmail.com/gishome/plsql/gis.show_chart?comp_id=2540&fid1=24951&period=999&indx1_id=0&fid2=0&pi_mov_type=SMA&pi_mov_avg1=&pi_mov_avg2=&pi_mov_avg3=&iaction=Go&pi_universe=PUBLIC_FUND





03年前表现一般,近几年随石油上升开始有起色,近三年的中型锯齿导致RISK教大;



图5,图6是两个precious metal 的MF (激进类;大波谷的出现使RISK大大增加到20以上的水平;风险大大提高



http://globefunddb.theglobeandmail.com/gishome/plsql/gis.show_chart?comp_id=2624&fid1=18215&period=999&indx1_id=0&fid2=0&pi_mov_type=SMA&pi_mov_avg1=&pi_mov_avg2=&pi_mov_avg3=&iaction=Go&pi_universe=PUBLIC_FUND



RBC的RISK=29.24



http://globefunddb.theglobeandmail.com/gishome/plsql/gis.show_chart?comp_id=2537&fid1=27536&period=999&indx1_id=0&fid2=0&pi_mov_type=SMA&pi_mov_avg1=&pi_mov_avg2=&pi_mov_avg3=&iaction=Go&pi_universe=PUBLIC_FUND



BMO的RISK=25.33, BETA=0.99





最后一个CHARTS是AGF MANAGED FUTURE,坏的MF(BAD CHATS)的一个典型例证;



http://globefunddb.theglobeandmail.com/gishome/plsql/gis.show_chart?comp_id=2528&fid1=21536&period=999&indx1_id=0&fid2=0&pi_mov_type=SMA&pi_mov_avg1=&pi_mov_avg2=&pi_mov_avg3=&iaction=Go&pi_universe=PUBLIC_FUND





它是下降形,大波谷,大锯齿都出现,RISK=82.66,是绝对要避免的MF






只要掌握上述看图的基本点,加上RISK与分类控制,相信你也能快速寻找到WINNING FUNDS.更多精彩文章及讨论,请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net
Sign in and Reply
Modify
Report

Replies, comments and Discussions:

  • 枫下家园 / 理财投资税务 / 投资理财系列之 从CHART中挑选互惠基金的简洁方法
    • 如有好的MF推荐或想听听他人意见,请POST CHARTS上来,我们大家一起评论评论,共同提高
      • What do you think about this MF, Jim?
        I invested on this last night. That fund only started two years ago and not rated yet. But it has been performing very well ever since. The fund manager was rated #1 Canadian Small Cap specialist. You can also read http://www.globefund.com/servlet/story/GFGAM.20060201.RBESTBETS01/GFStory/
        I don't think many people want to take the risk as it's small cap and newly started but I wanna give a try.
        • 风险就在于其历史太短,没有经过2000年熊市的考验.不过,做长期投资,也不妨一试
      • I bought some "RBC Dividend (RBF266) Canada" and Acuity High Income . what do u think? I gonna keep for long term. And watching PH & N Dividend Income Series A for a while.
        http://www.morningstar.ca/globalhome/QuickTakes/Fund_Overview.asp?fundid=6711

        http://www.morningstar.ca/globalhome/QuickTakes/Fund_Overview.asp?fundid=6930

        I am watching PH & N Dividend Income Series A. This one is a conservative but have a good return in long history. But need init > 25K. So a litter bit hasitate....

        http://www.morningstar.ca/globalhome/QuickTakes/Fund_Overview.asp?fundid=3813

        I feel energy sector too high now...
        • RBC DIV 和ACUITY HIGH INCOME,都属于GROWTH INCOME类,都不错. 属于风险较小的FNDS, AUCITY 的RISK=8.93, 比RBC FUND RISK= 7.67,要略大一点,
          这从图中看出05年ACUITY有三个(下降)小锯齿 ,而RBC只有一个.PH & N Dividend Income 也不错(RISK=7.83)
          三个都差不多.用SHARP RATIO比较,
          RBC (2.487)
          ACUITY(2.555)
          PH&N(2.242).

          用过去三年的数值,ACUITY 略微好一点(2.555)
        • 不过,要注意,PH&N DIV近期的战绩没有BEAT指数和AVERAGE(历史尚可),不如RBC ANFD ACUITY
          • 这正是我关注PH&N的原因。
            Because recently most of high return funds related to energy. And energy sector is too high now, (although it's still good in long term) and risk become higher. On the other hand, this fund is consistent in their investment style all the time -- they put more than 50% on finance service. I feel it's safer to invest this kind of fund than the higher returning energy fund at current time.
            what do you think?
            • 有一定道理
      • 另外,你觉得今年投资BOND如何?近年BOND回报不佳,但总觉得应Keep 30% bond in my investment. Now, it's only about 5-10% in mine. Do you buy bond?
        • 我对投资BOND不太熟悉. 暂时还没持有BOND FUNDS.FIXED-INCOME部分只有INCOM TRUST和MONTHLY INCOME FUNDS
    • 谢谢分享. 能简单说下RISK=6.39, 4.77 等等是如何计算出来的么?
      • 这些数值是直接引用GLOBEFUND上的,不过也可以自己计算,详见本人的POST-简谈RISK (有连接)