This website requires Javascript to function properly. Please go to the setting of your web browser and enable Javascript for this website.

Ad by

but i'd read something like this?

netee(netee)

When your brakes lock up on wet and slippery roads or during a panic stop, you lose steering control and your vehicle can spin. Rear wheel ABS prevents wheel lockup so that your car stays in a straight line. If your car has ABS control on all four wheels, you also keep steering control. If you have steering control, it is possible to avoid a crash by steering around hazards if a complete stop cannot be accomplished in time.

http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/problems/equipment/ABSBRAKES.html

(#430363@0)
Last Updated: 2002-4-1
This post has been archived. It cannot be replied.

Report

Replies, comments and Discussions:

枫下家园 / 爱车一族 / 请教一个问题，CIVIC DX能否加装ABS？ -heian(㊣黑暗天使); 2002-4-1 (#429268@0)

不能太贵了 -jiangye(浆液); 2002-4-1 (#429360@0)

呃。。。谢谢。ABS的原理我知道，但是对于在实际情况中的发挥还请教到底怎么样？性命攸关的东西，不敢大意，请指教！不能是指绝对不能装还是相对价格而言太贵？大概多贵？ -heian(㊣黑暗天使); 2002-4-1 (#429377@0)

它保证你刹死车的时候四个轮不会锁死，所以你打胎还有用。没有abs, 一但四个轮锁死(就是不滚），你打胎就没用了，那就会往打滑的那个方向一路滑过去。 -jeffrey815(Smartiecat); 2002-4-1 (#429381@0)

靠！天使要打胎？天使你可千万别干傻事儿，什么都可以玩儿，这可不能玩儿。：))) -jzwang(hello); 2002-4-1 (#429384@0)

我还用试过有万一的情况我要刹死车。so far I'm a safe driver. :) -jeffrey815(Smartiecat); 2002-4-1 (#429383@0)
ABS非常有用，总会遇到急煞车的时候 -rock_jack(大门); 2002-4-1 (#429475@0)
ABS的一个缺点是：在恶劣气候下，比如冰雪，刹车距离相对较长。lemon-aids上说统计数字显示：带ABS的车并不比非ABS的车更安全。 -jwu(g2w); 2002-4-1 (#430319@0)

车子打转会更危险, 如果正好转到侧面去撞东西, 肯定吃大亏. -netee(netee); 2002-4-1 (#430337@0)

ABS本身并不会避免车子失控 -x86(禅坐ing); 2002-4-1 (#430340@0)

but i'd read something like this? -netee(netee); 2002-4-1 {427} (#430363@0)
When your brakes lock up on wet and slippery roads or during a panic stop, you lose steering control and your vehicle can spin. Rear wheel ABS prevents wheel lockup so that your car stays in a straight line. If your car has ABS control on all four wheels, you also keep steering control. If you have steering control, it is possible to avoid a crash by steering around hazards if a complete stop cannot be accomplished in time.
http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/problems/equipment/ABSBRAKES.html

这样说是有一定的道理的，因为ABS能让你将刹车揣到底后还能继续转向。但一旦发生under steering或over steering而失控的话ABS不会帮助纠正，要有专门的系统来控制相应的轮子来矫正 -x86(禅坐ing); 2002-4-1 (#430375@0)

倒也，统计数据表明：装ABS的车比没装的在雨雪天事故率低27％ -hairless(亮晶晶); 2002-4-1 (#430838@0)

我也想知道这ABS和非ABS到底差在什么地方，DISC不同？刹车管路不同？控制电路不同？ -hyundai(Elantra93); 2002-4-1 (#429517@0)

帮忙UP一下，因为俺也不知道。不过，DISC该是一样的吧，估计是控制方法不一样。DX们来扫盲了 -mike_pearl(老汉); 2002-4-1 (#430300@0)

非ABS在每个轮子上应该没有监控器，也没有电脑来控制。反正你踩刹车它就抱住不放。 -x86(禅坐ing); 2002-4-1 (#430309@0)

ABS会在急停时模拟每秒几十次的点刹 -netee(netee); 2002-4-1 (#430332@0)

好像是16次 -clock(小闹钟-叮铃铃); 2002-4-1 (#430828@0)

好像不都一样，有的次数多有的少 -x86(禅坐ing); 2002-4-1 (#430831@0)

我的脚也基本上可以做到。每次踢完球开车，脚放在油门上抖个不停，16次达不到，5-6次差不多。 -eglington(eglington); 2002-4-1 (#430852@0)

放在油门上刹车？ -x86(禅坐ing); 2002-4-1 (#430856@0)

“ABS的一个缺点是：在恶劣气候下，比如冰雪，刹车距离相对较长”。这一点是错误的。滚动摩擦力是大于滑动摩擦力。 -cindyzhang(cindy); 2002-4-2 {237} (#432407@0)
“ABS的一个缺点是：在恶劣气候下，比如冰雪，刹车距离相对较长”。这一点是错误的。滚动摩擦力是大于滑动摩擦力。在铁路系统，牵引机车的最大牵引力就在车轮和铁轨即将打滑的一瞬间，这一时刻的摩擦系数称为最大黏着系数，该系数是机车制造业的追求目标。

@Calgary

but i'd read something like this?

Replies, comments and Discussions:

More Topics