This topic has been archived. It cannot be replied.
-
枫下茶话 / 法律 / 聊聊申请枫叶卡的事:
-whitetiger(whitetiger);
2002-9-24
{1853}
(#764112@0)
-
从去年2001年以来到6月27号前的新移民大多不满足领枫叶卡的条件?????You scared me!@@....ZA3 BAN4?~
-mildkiller(M.K.);
2002-9-24
(#764117@0)
-
你去仔细读读IMM5444和它的说明,人家说了“过去五年一定要住满730天”!
-whitetiger(whitetiger);
2002-9-24
(#764130@0)
-
No such thing!
-ding_ding(丁_丁);
2002-9-24
(#764313@0)
-
对于我和大多数一年新的新移民,真是一个难题。我想移民局会被迫接受大量这样的申请。因为该卡本身就自带矛盾:它也同时授予正在办理移民的人,他们也没有两年担保人啊。
-zyl_prc(George);
2002-10-17
(#802635@0)
-
移民部的要求确实过分,我们应该发出一点声音。
-pyramid(㊣金字塔);
2002-9-24
(#764131@0)
-
写信给部长。B-) 我觉得不太可能是故意的陷阱,等着官方的道歉和解释吧。
-pingle(Lucky Pingle Pie);
2002-9-24
(#764152@0)
-
部长的地址是什么?
-pyramid(㊣金字塔);
2002-9-24
(#764158@0)
-
:O 不知道,你去找一下嘛,你说是email好还是邮寄的mail好?:D
-pingle(Lucky Pingle Pie);
2002-9-24
(#764160@0)
-
BOTH.
-pyramid(㊣金字塔);
2002-9-24
(#764176@0)
-
你办事,我们放心。:D
-pingle(Lucky Pingle Pie);
2002-9-24
(#764180@0)
-
大家都要办,其实如果每人写一封,绝对会改变目前的政策,算一下帐,一张邮票0.47,比什么公正费、宣誓费、申请非贵多了。至于写信没什么,我花了二十分钟写完的。咱托福作文是满分。:)
-pyramid(㊣金字塔);
2002-9-24
{20}
(#764205@0)
-
好啊,10月下旬等我到了多伦多,如果那时候还没道歉和更改的话,我也寄一封义正词严的去。:P
-pingle(Lucky Pingle Pie);
2002-9-24
(#764220@0)
-
修改后的抗议信(仅供参考,建议修改后再发)。附公民部和移民部的电子邮件。
-pyramid(㊣金字塔);
2002-9-24
{2195}
(#764248@0)
-
you are so cute! where do you live? now the postage fee within canada is $0.48 exclusive tax. after reading your poor letter, I am sure that TOEFL's essay means nothing.
-jqian(Q_Q);
2002-9-24
(#764369@0)
-
Well it is really nothing but many people have to attend that test. I hope you will not be one of them. Do you think that $0.01 really so important?
-pyramid(㊣金字塔);
2002-9-24
(#764375@0)
-
it's not important whether I have ever taken TOEFL exam, neither is $0.01 difference of the postage fee. But your lack of common sence really makes me laugh.I strongly recommend you not write a letter because it's too fomal and there are too many words so that it's out of your ability. You are supposed to be a picketer or protester sitting on the ground before CIC office while you could even fast to cleanse your body as well as spirit. :D
-jqian(Q_Q);
2002-9-24
{287}
(#764395@0)
-
Sigh, after so many years of Chinese education for the English grammer, you still can not express correctly what you mean?
-pyramid(㊣金字塔);
2002-9-24
(#764418@0)
-
I am afraid you could not even figure out the meaning of 'fast', 'cleanse' and the sentence structure because of your poor education. that's the reason why you could not understand
-jqian(Q_Q);
2002-9-24
(#764430@0)
-
I hate to talk to you but it was you attacked me in the first place. I had lower education than you so please do not reply any of my posts from now on. Thanks.
-pyramid(㊣金字塔);
2002-9-24
(#764439@0)
-
I just want to help you to improve. If I could input chinese now, I would explain the detail meaning of those words to you. Don't be shy for your lower education. :D
-jqian(Q_Q);
2002-9-24
(#764456@0)
-
别理这种人,我们支持pyramid的想法,做总比不做的好,枫叶卡真是个匪夷所思的东西.........加拿大是个讲诚信的国家,正面的抗议比较好,至少得试一试
-away(away from home);
2002-9-25
{54}
(#765727@0)
-
beyond one's abilityyou too.
-mssg(mssg);
2002-9-24
{8}
(#764438@0)
-
'beyond' and 'out of' are same here. don't show off with your limited knowledge.
-jqian(Q_Q);
2002-9-24
(#764450@0)
-
show off with your limited knowledge....Q_Q
-mssg(mssg);
2002-9-24
(#764477@0)
-
Show off with.
-pyramid(㊣金字塔);
2002-9-24
(#764493@0)
-
I strongly recommed you buy a good dictionary where you could pick up the meaning of 'show off'. it's really good to you.
-jqian(Q_Q);
2002-9-24
(#764511@0)
-
Good to you. :D
-pyramid(㊣金字塔);
2002-9-24
(#764571@0)
-
In formal english, 'good to' can replace 'good for'. Here using 'to' instead of 'unto'. Do you know the word 'unto'? you are really a fool but always trying to show off.
-jqian(Q_Q);
2002-9-24
(#764596@0)
-
do you know the meaning of 'show off'? TSK. :D
-jqian(Q_Q);
2002-9-24
(#764501@0)
-
Go to =>
-mssg(mssg);
2002-9-24
{164}
(#764528@0)
-
that's the 'vt'. 'show off' could also be used as 'vi' followed by 'with'. The word 'limited' described you very well.
-jqian(Q_Q);
2002-9-24
(#764539@0)
-
u r lovely
-mssg(mssg);
2002-9-24
(#764552@0)
-
u r cute
-jqian(Q_Q);
2002-9-24
(#764559@0)
-
Don't be shy for your lower education. :D
-mssg(mssg);
2002-9-24
(#764483@0)
-
Lower? I am not sure.
-pyramid(㊣金字塔);
2002-9-24
(#764497@0)
-
刚刚查过了,说TOEFLnothing的人雅思才5.5,,,,,,,,,啧啧!厉害。。。。。
-away(away from home);
2002-9-25
(#765735@0)
-
实在看不下去了,没考过托福的居然说托福是nothing,,,,,,自大的可以!
-away(away from home);
2002-9-25
(#765724@0)
-
how do you know I had not taken TOEFL? I am sure my TOEFL score and TWE are higher than yours. Also, my GPA is much higher than yours. please refer #765203
-jqian(Q_Q);
2002-9-25
(#765858@0)
-
版主,能否把jqian定为不受欢迎的人,封其IP。
-jami(jami);
2002-9-25
(#767105@0)
-
我也同意。一个政府不会这么去做的。
-kevin2000(流星雨-我俗,还不成);
2002-9-24
(#764161@0)
-
看的头痛
-suantou(蒜头mm);
2002-9-24
(#764215@0)
-
我个人的理解
-tytang(TY);
2002-9-24
{1526}
(#764247@0)
-
我还没仔细看这些东西。反正我从来不担心他们敢不发枫叶卡给我。X-( 不过,不管怎么样,它引起了大家这么多担忧或者误解,我们完全有必要要求官方做出更清晰的解释。
-pingle(Lucky Pingle Pie);
2002-9-24
(#764268@0)
-
只是你要回来办和拿。
-tytang(TY);
2002-9-24
(#764287@0)
-
on the supplementary form (IMM5455), you should also fill your client ID in section 3. Actually most immigrants do not know their client ID during immigration application.
-jqian(Q_Q);
2002-9-24
(#764361@0)
-
Do you still remember the Client ID?
-tytang(TY);
2002-9-24
(#764377@0)
-
are you kidding? We are not supposed to be given any client ID while applying immigration. I mean client ID, something like 1234-5678. it's not file number and landing paper number.
-jqian(Q_Q);
2002-9-24
(#764404@0)
-
I see, I do remember I saw my Client ID once on the copy of fee invoice. I will check my parents this evening, and give you a feedback.
-tytang(TY);
2002-9-24
(#764417@0)
-
I am afraid you are wrong. I have the receipt in had now. it's not client id. every person should has a client id, but you and your wife share one receipt.
-jqian(Q_Q);
2002-9-24
(#764425@0)
-
I will check my parent first. I do remember I see the Client ID on the first receipt copy. If not such one, I will check my immigration agent.I think my wife and I should share one Client ID, because we applied as a family not independently.
-tytang(TY);
2002-9-24
{99}
(#764441@0)
-
just call the CIC call center, tell them your personal information and landing paper number, you will get your client id.
-jqian(Q_Q);
2002-9-24
(#764458@0)
-
Good idea. Proven?
-tytang(TY);
2002-9-24
(#764463@0)
-
exactly proven! I have two unique client IDs now. one is for myself, while the other is for my wife.
-jqian(Q_Q);
2002-9-24
(#764468@0)
-
see #764464 and thanks again.
-tytang(TY);
2002-9-24
(#764475@0)
-
my wife and I also applied as a family case, but I got two unique client IDs yesterday.
-jqian(Q_Q);
2002-9-24
(#764461@0)
-
I see. Thanks and I will check them out.
-tytang(TY);
2002-9-24
(#764464@0)
-
“absence”是“不在,缺席”的意思。如果你还没登陆,当然也是不在,缺席。我也倾向于他们的工作失误,但这是法律文件,按说要很严谨才对。另外,对法律文件的理解,就是要逐字逐句理解,不能自己去推论。
-whitetiger(whitetiger);
2002-9-24
(#765105@0)
-
我建议你去查查absence from 一词再回来说话. 不好意思,我感觉你在凭空臆想,你有证实过吗?笑话!!!
-tytang(TY);
2002-9-24
(#765133@0)
-
本来不想说,因为不喜欢打字,但看见这么多曲解和误解,实在忍不住,就说说吧
-syhhy(GoingWithTheFlow);
2002-9-24
{1312}
(#764305@0)
-
那里有免费的?能说详细点吗?
-ebusiness(ebusiness);
2002-9-24
(#764334@0)
-
#763182
-syhhy(GoingWithTheFlow);
2002-9-24
(#764343@0)
-
我和我的朋友都很感兴趣,可以告诉我们怎麽找吗?
-manyquestion(manyquestion);
2002-9-24
(#764923@0)
-
#764598
-syhhy(GoingWithTheFlow);
2002-9-24
(#764929@0)
-
Great, Thanks.
-mssg(mssg);
2002-9-24
(#764342@0)
-
我在决定写抗议信之前的第一件事,就是下载移民部的文件并经过了仔细阅读。个人认为信中没有任何误解他们文件的地方。倒是很多提醒我要了解好政策再写信的人,根本就没读我写的信就发贴了。对于我个人来讲,找人也不是难事,我的同事都是。他们可以签署我的驾照复印件,但是他们无法证明他们认识我之前的事情,所以还得去宣誓。我觉得政府把这件事搞得很复杂,当然谁都可以做到,但是太麻烦了。
对于离开加拿大申请的事,可能更复杂,我没有仔细研究过。
-pyramid(㊣金字塔);
2002-9-24
{248}
(#764352@0)
-
my thought1. It must be very hard to get some common sense.
2. It must be even harder to listen to different opinions.
3 The hardest is to listen to oneself.
4. PR card is for immigrants' own convenience, of course those landed between 1998-2002 will have to apply again, government is not making things difficult for anyone resident in Canada.
5. I beleive I read most of your posts
-mssg(mssg);
2002-9-24
{386}
(#764365@0)
-
PR card is for immigrants' own convenience不同意。以前没有这玩艺,一样很方便。这东西完全是美国的九一一逼出来的,你竟然不知道吗?有什么更方便的,说出来听听。
-pyramid(㊣金字塔);
2002-9-24
{114}
(#764370@0)
-
The idea of PR card came up before sept.11, 2001.
-jqian(Q_Q);
2002-9-24
(#764408@0)
-
I believe that should apply to new arrivals. For those who aleady landed, landing paper should be ok. Just my personnal opinion.
-pyramid(㊣金字塔);
2002-9-24
(#764420@0)
-
有些人的发贴和回贴风格也真算是Rolia一景。:-)所谓“文如其人”。
-jianghongca(慎独);
2002-9-24
{18}
(#764371@0)
-
你的信看过,个人看法:纯粹浪费子弹。不过已经发了,再说什么也没用了。你也是自办移民出来的,应该知道,越是重要的证件,特别是关乎国家安全的证件,申请手续越麻烦,哪儿都一样。
-syhhy(GoingWithTheFlow);
2002-9-24
(#764392@0)
-
枫叶卡是专为回国发展人士准备的返加纸
-zhylj(爱谁谁);
2002-9-24
{1710}
(#764488@0)
-
I just confirmed with the immigration officer through their hotline;
-maile(FinchEast);
2002-9-24
{634}
(#764520@0)
-
Thank you for your effort. Who can be witness of my oath? My colleague who has PEO licence or anyone could be my witness?
-pyramid(㊣金字塔);
2002-9-24
(#764537@0)
-
Well, this we need to find out;Reading the guideline, we know that a commissioner, a notary public, or a person authorized by law to administer oaths in all matters, or in the jurisdiction in which it is subscribed (the latter part I don't understand completely), can be your witness of oath in lieu of guarantor.
-maile(FinchEast);
2002-9-24
{283}
(#764563@0)
-
谢谢你!我更加放心了。:D
-pingle(Lucky Pingle Pie);
2002-9-24
(#765308@0)
-
没明白你让我看#764520干什么,我没觉得我有什么误解。
-jqian(Q_Q);
2002-9-24
(#765399@0)
-
支持金字塔的行动. 他做了一件好事,行使了自己的民主权力. 新移民中这样的人多点才好. 都是各顾各, 政府还以为没有不同意见了. 不明白为什么有些人要这样对他冷嘲热讽.
-goodbye(古德白);
2002-9-24
{627}
(#764541@0)
-
谢谢!这就象一场政治运动,让人想到文革。:)
-pyramid(㊣金字塔);
2002-9-24
(#764566@0)
-
我赞成金字塔!这种办法只是做给老美看的。想想看那些2001年9月11号前拿到LP的,他们完全可能6月28号后来登陆,这些人也没通过很严格的安全审查,不照样拿到枫叶卡了?防恐怖份子?就这帮连个法律文件都写得漏洞百出的人,能行吗?
-whitetiger(whitetiger);
2002-9-24
{58}
(#765121@0)
-
支持!既然在加拿大,有一点是特应该向本地人学习的--包容和海涵,这也是中华民族欠缺的。自己有不同想法敢于讲出来,别人有不同想法也要包容--学会善待异己。别人有别人的理由,也许是你所不理解或不知的。宽容些吧。
-dryleaf(dryleaf);
2002-9-24
(#765379@0)
-
并且,即便如此实施,加国政府的初衷--防止恐怖分子进入加国--也未必能达到,还无端增加了良民们的烦恼,足见有些政府官员的无能和愚蠢。
-dryleaf(dryleaf);
2002-9-24
(#765392@0)
-
大家不要太着急了,多咨询一下CALL CENTER我今天打了电话给移民部申请枫叶卡的CALL CENTER,问了大家所关心的一些问题,他们的回答如下:
1。过去五年内住满超过730天是一个条件,但不是必要条件,对于象我这种来了还不到一年的移民来说,过去五年是以登陆那一天为起始日期的。
2。如果找不到认识超过两年的担保人,可以到CITY HALL或COURT HOUSE找政府官员,他们有责任为你CERTIFY。
各位网友如还有什么问题,也可以打CALL CENTER的电话去问:1-800-255-4541,这样了解到的信息会更准确和真实一些。也希望各位热心的网友们能将自己得到的信息和大家分享。
-cocobear(可可熊);
2002-9-24
{480}
(#764598@0)
-
谢谢你!我估计问的人多了,他们应该出版一个专门的FAQ了。
-pingle(Lucky Pingle Pie);
2002-9-24
(#765333@0)
-
请问,我今年2月登陆后马上就回来了,准备明年再去.像我这种情况,明年再登陆以后申请枫叶卡应该是没有问题的吧?文件中写到2002年成为移民的人应该在10月15日-11月30日之间申请,所以不知道像我这种2002年登陆后又出境的人明年再申请枫叶卡可不可以?
-sjxkw(稍有不安);
2002-9-24
{125}
(#765375@0)
-
我和你一样如果你有新消息麻烦联系我好吗?LINDACN99@HOTMAIL.COM谢谢!
-mnbvc(linda);
2002-9-25
(#767538@0)
-
我会的. 不过你看没有人回答咱的问题...
-sjxkw(稍有不安);
2002-9-27
(#770137@0)
-
关于枫叶卡的一个重要问题要写出申请人过去5年的工作、学习和住址的经历!在申请枫叶卡的申请表中有一项是要写出申请人过去5年的工作、学习和住址的经历。你是不是每个月都要写清楚写清楚!还有就是本人是2002年登陆的,在加拿大还呆不够半年,还有4年多在中国的经历,是不是还要写在中国的经历,这岂不是再办一次移民吗?前几天我有一个朋友打电话给加拿大移民局的咨询电话,接线员说:如果是在2002年成为移民而且没有离开加拿大的,就不用填写在过去5年中,加拿大以外的经历的,只填写这半年在加拿大的住址的经历!不知道这是否可行!请各位一次讨论这个问题。
-21son(Cantonese);
2002-9-27
{453}
(#770891@0)
-
对楼主和金字塔说两句枫叶卡这件事情非常简单,没有必要太紧张。
打一个电话过去就什么都明白了:加拿大政府关心的是你成为PR之后的事情。所以,如果登陆超过五年了,就把五年来的经历写清楚;如果不足五年,就从登陆的时候开始,以月份为单位,写清楚居住、学习、工作、离境的经历。
担保人?要知道5455还有个section G,是可以通过公正解决的。
请大家想想,移民都让咱们移了,还能不给咱们枫叶卡?
放松,好好准备材料。
有问题问我,我在这里贴了一个“完整描述”。
祝大家好运!!
-fish_ear(fish_ear);
2002-10-1
{445}
(#775978@0)